|
The
bill to ban, sorry licence, hunting with dogs should become
law later this year. The tests of Cruelty,
Utility and Least
Suffering will then be used to end angling.
Angling
is far worse cruelty as we all know - and the most important
fact is that there is NO Justification and NO Need to catch
fish - they aren't pests and cause no harm. That means that
virtually all Angling will fail the
Utility test completely - it is just not necessary.
That coupled with its Cruelty
will be enough to ban it. Some river based trout and salmon
fishing for food might survive in the short term.
There
are some well founded opinions that as these Tests were seen
necessary for hunting then the Government has to apply them
to any other so called sport which involves animals. If the
Government does not then there are, on these opinions, very
strong grounds for an action through the European Court to
force the Government to apply them to Angling.
One
way or another the government have given us the way to get
angling banned - simply through the way the hunting bill
was written. Some of us doubted that this approach would ever
work - but we bow down to the expertise of the long term plans
of some of our colleagues! A long time (and expensive) to
get the first domino to move - but now it looks as if the
three will fall one after another!
BUT,
BUT, BUT and this is CRITICAL - Anglers
MUST NOT REALISE THIS.
If the hunters are able to get the message across to the anglers
that the hunting bill will bring an end to angling it may
provoke enough of them to get involved with the hunters. If
there were large scale protest from the angling community
against the hunting bill the Government may be too frightened
- and back away from seeing it through parliament. If that
were to happen it will stop us getting a ban on angling for
a long time.
|